Thursday, January 28, 2010

We Consistently Reward Incompetence and Misconduct - Reaping What We've Sown.

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



We Consistently Reward Incompetence and Misconduct - Reaping What We've Sown.

Note: This article was written by author Douglas Castle for simultaneous publication in his personal blog (Douglas Castle), as well as TAKING COMMAND!, HUMANITAS MAXIMUS, Douglas Castle's INTERNAL ENERGY PLUS and in THE NATIONAL NETWORKER RSS Feed and Daily Email Supplement. You can (and should) get the Supplement for free at http://twitlik.com/Daily, and you can join The National Networker GICBC (also, at no cost) by clicking on http://twitlik.com/IN.

Dear Friends:

I chanced upon this unsurprising but nonetheless saddening piece of news in an excerpt from the venerable New York Times today:

Breaking News Alert

The New York Times
Thu, January 28, 2010 -- 4:13 PM ET
-----
U.S. Senate Confirms Ben Bernanke for a 2nd Term as Fed Governor


The Senate confirmed Ben S. Bernanke to a second term at the
helm of the Federal Reserve. The confirmation was a victory
for President Obama, who had called Mr. Bernanke a critical
leader in the nation's recovery from recession, but the
rancor surrounding the vote also signaled the extent to which
the Fed, once little known to the public, has become the
object of populist anger over high unemployment and bank
bailouts.


Read More:


http://www.nytimes.com?emc=na
####


Let me warm to the topic by saying that I'm not interested in making a political statement here. I am interested in posing a brief commentary on behavioral psychology and sociological evolution.

Some of you may recall that it was during Mr. Bernanke's "watch" that the United States Federal Reserve, with either the consent, an incredible lack of vision, or a hideous dereliction of duty on the part of a huge number of other governmental agencies (including, but not limited to the Treasury, The Controller of the Currency, FINRA, The SEC, The Commissioners of Insurance, The Legislature, The Executive Office and a host of other regulatory and enforcement bodies charged with the responsibility of protecting the citizenry and its hard-earned assets from pilferage and fraud by dirty, rotten scoundrels, con-artists, and other classes of persons whose debits never quite equal their credits) allowed an uncontrolled economic avalanche to destroy the United States economy, the lives of countless individuals, and the credibility (or the already-decaying nostalgic memories of credibility) of the  notion of an "honest" government to serve and protect the interests of the citizens whose contributions (through taxes and other tribute) actually finance the government...that is, of course, when the government isn't simply printing out bargeloads of paper currency and issuing debt instruments which it has no genuine plans or means of paying.

Mr. Bernanke just got himself confirmed for a second term at the helm of the U.S. of A. The thinking (using this latter term loosely) is that although he made a few "small mistakes" that "might have" helped to precipitate a "major recession," he kept things from getting as bad as he could have let them become. He bailed out the largest, greediest and most irresponsible financial institutions and other corporate interests because "they were too big to fail," [I'm inventing here] "too large to fit in jail," or "too fat to impale." 

He now gets rewarded for, in effect, driving drunk, hitting an elderly woman (who was walking her poodle) and managing to put her in his car and leave her on the steps of a hospital. This chap is the same symbol of shoulder-shrugging status quo who rewarded the unconscionable wrongdoing of an elite few at an incalculably devastating cost to this generation and to numerous generations to follow.

Why does this type of seemingly irrational system of "inverted incentives" continue to proliferate? Here are my guesses:

1. We have lowered our standards and our expectations;
2. Our perception is that any known quantity is better than a walk into the unknown;
3. We believe that our thoughts and feelings no longer make a difference;
4. We have lost our faith in our own fundamental values, because we live in a society where evil all too frequently triumphs;
5. We have lost our will to be free, and have resigned ourselves to being institutionalized;
6. We have lost the stamina to be activists, advocates and fighters;
7. We are living in fear of the government that is supposed to serve us.

An old colleague had two funny posters in his office at Hofstra University. One said "NO GOOD DEED SHALL GO UNPUNISHED." The other stated "UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES, THE BEATINGS WILL CONTINUE."

Facing facts, if we continue to stand idly by while incompetence and misconduct are permitted free reign, we don't deserve anything better. If you weren't insulted by that last sentence, then you probably will also fail to see that this is not a blog posting. It is a call to action.

You can get in touch with me by pressing the blue button below.

It's time for this GICBC notion to become a movement. Cooperate. Collaborate. Synergize.

We cannot build a peaceful prosperous future upon a cracked and decaying foundation, just as we cannot expect to find gold nuggets while panning in a tar pit, or expecting to grow fruit trees when we are planting sawgrass.

Trying to work within the constructs and constraints of the current paradigm is very much like trying to polish a turd. Stop for a moment and visualize it. Hmmm...

I enjoy ranting. How about you?

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle

Comments to Douglas Castle
Douglas Castle - LinkedIn Profile
Follow Castle on Twitter 


COMMENT On This Article!

FREE NEWSLETTER

Published by THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter. All rights reserved. Subscribe Free, and get your BLUE TUESDAY REPORT, too. - Click HERE.
The National Networker Companies

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Away Message From Douglas Castle

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Away Message From Douglas Castle

Dear Friends:

I will be out of town from 18th January, and returning on 26th January. During this interval, I will not be accessing or responding to any emails, telephone messages or posting any material to blogs or social media. I look forward to being in touch with you soon after my return.

All the best, Respectfully,

Douglas Castle
Primary e-mail address:douglas.castle@yahoo.com,



Saturday, January 16, 2010

Tactics Versus Strategies - Integrating and Optimizing

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



TACTICS VERSUS STRATEGIES - Integrating and Optimizing.

This article was writtten by Douglas Castle for publication in TAKING COMMAND! Douglas Castle is a Featured Columnist in The National Networker Newsletter. You can join the National Networker GICBC for free, and receive their intel-rich Weekly Newsletter and other special reports by clicking on http://twitlik.com/in . This is a strong suggestion -- and not a command.










Dear Friends:

Understand the significant difference between tactics and strategies, and learn the way to think about each. Just as importantly, integrate them properly in order to achieve real results and to avoid walking a needlessly random path governed by the sway of outside forces.

Strategies are means (plans) for achieving large, longer-term objectives. These objectives are the defining conclusions of success in any operation, mission or business. A strategy is the main road (as in a straight line) between where you are today, and where you must be at the end-game point.

The deviations from this highway (because of a suddenly downed tree, a stalled vehicle, an exposed powerline or other unforseen impediments along the straight path which require special "instant fixes," "circumnavigation," "alternative methods") are addressed with tactics. Tactics are very like short-run situational strategies within a grander, macroscopic strategy.

The keys are these:

1). Have a clearly-defined goal;

2). Have a clearly-designed strategy to get there;

3). Utilize tactics along the way as necessitated by circumstances;

4). Even while involved in a tactical maneuver, keep the goal and strategy in mind;

5). The tactic cannot conflict with the strategy -- it merely serves as a means of overcoming an obstacle that separates you from the straight strategic path to your goal;

6). Do not ever let a tactic dominate your mission, or you will stray from your strategy and become lost further and further in the woods. You will become involved in a crisis management mindset with its accompanying shortcomings, and will wind up either far off course, or just dealing with problem after problem with your initial objective all but disappearing from your consciousness and efforts;

7). Use tactics which make it possible to comply with your planned strategy -- always keep your eyes on the prize.

NASCAR gives us some fine examples. A driver's objective is to complete his laps as quickly as possible in order to win. His strategy involves endurance, energy direction, focus, pacing, staying ahead of the pack and pushing forward. Evasive maneuvers to pass or avoid colliding with other cars are merely tactics to support the objective. If a driver becomes too obsessed with every petty speed battle or potentially vindictive squeeze or smashup with every other driver, he will lose his focus on finishing first. In sum: Evasive maneuvers are tactics, and making speeding along the track as quickly and fuel-efficiently as possible is the strategy. The objective is to finish first, out of all of the contenders.

Don't let tactics become diversions. Don't let them become missions unto themselves. Don't let tactics turn into your principal occupation in accomplishing goals. Tactics are used in order to support the mission and to see that impediments and obstacles are rapidly and effectively removed from the straight path to the prize.

Tactical thinking, taken to its extreme, causes an otherwise good team to stray from its course, waste time and resources, and to be thrown into the tempest of crisis management. and crisis management is one of the biggest encumbrances to successful completion of a mission.

If you permit your entire focus to be shifted from your principal objective every time you are confronted with some element of difficulty along the path, you will never gain territory -- you will merely lose time and momentum.

Harmonize your tactics within the grander framework of the strategy which you have plotted for your success. Don't let diversions turn into excursions.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle
http://aboutDouglasCastle.blogspot.com
http://www.LinkedIn.com/in/douglascastle

COMMENT On This Article!

Subscribe to The NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter and the BLUE TUESDAY REPORT free.

Douglas Castle's Breakthrough - The Fastest Way to Qualify a Prospective Client!

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Douglas Castle's Breakthrough - The Fastest Way to Qualify a Prospective Client!

We spend a great amount of time romancing and convincing prospective clients to take advantage of our services. Many times, a prospective client will even approach one of us (and we know who we are) and begin to "pick our brains" on an informal (i.e., unpaid and generally thankless) basis, complimenting us on our expertise, experience, wisdom and other fine things which substitute for "currency" or "fees" in the lexicon of the cheapskate and the would-be consultant with low self-esteem.

My familiarity with the field of economics tells me that you cannot make a living dispensing advice or services for free. Ask your physician. Ask your lawyer (but then hang up the telephone quickly). Even ask your personal fitness trainer. Your expertise, efforts and time are worth money. When you speak with somebody, you are actually investing in him or her. If he or she is a serious client, he or she will invest in you, as well. It is a fair exchange. It is commerce, as well as conversation.

Here are my suggested steps for qualifying a prospective client:

1).  Limit the amount of time you expend discussing technical issues or technical advice. Giving a preview of a plan, campaign, tactic or strategy is more than sufficient;

2).  Advise the individual that you do what you do professionally, and that others actually compensate you for it;

3). Give the individual a homework assignment which requires that he or she spend several hours of serious thinking, and that the answer is to be given to you in the form of a brief report. If your prospective client either refuses to do this assignment (presumably for the purpose of helping you to learn more about the issue involved in a the possible engagement), or just never quite gets around to doing it, don't waste another minute. Move on. Don't speculate with your future and your fortune. Don't walk on eggshells -- it's better to do a quick flamenco and get refused outright than to go through a fruitless courtship (these latter two words, taken together, are now politically incorrect - I apologize) that consumes too much of your time and too many of your resources.

Save your talent for someone who values it.

Remember: It is often a thin line between doing a friend a small favor or allowing yourself to be taken for a ride to poverty.

Don't be a miser. Just don't be a fool.

Make time your friend instead of your adversary.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle
http://aboutDouglasCastle.blogspot.com 

Join The National Networker's GICBC. It's free. Click on http://twitlik.com/IN and you're set.

Comments to Douglas Castle


COMMENT On This Article!

Subscribe to The NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter and the BLUE TUESDAY REPORT free.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

We are a mighty force...

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



We are a mighty force if work together instead of against each other. The most dangerous people win by dividing us. - Douglas Castle 

Please visit http://twitter.com/TNNW_BUZZWORKS . We'll follow you back.

Please visit http://twitter.com/GICBC . Be part of the start. And yes, we'll follow you back, too.

Braintenance - Stay razor sharp.
The Internationalist Page - A world without barriers.
The Global Futurist - Revealing trends.
Taking Command! - Mastering your fate.

Join us! With your free membership, you'll receive THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter and The BLUE TUESDAY Report. Click on: http://twitlik.com/IN. You'll also want to get your free RSS feed or Daily email delivered to your inbox -- just click on http://twitlik.com/Daily and make your selection.

COMMENT On This Article!

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Being in the Right Place

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Dear Friends:
 
It is an extraordinarily difficult thing to a) know when you're in the right place, and to b) know when it's the right time. It is far easier to know when you're in the wrong place or if it is the wrong time.
 
My proposition is simple: Assuming that you cannot bilocate (or even be in two places at the same time), you can increase your odds of being in the right place at the right time by making a quick assessment -- if you intuitively feel that you are in the wrong place, leave quickly. If you intuitively feel that it is the wrong time, either wait, or take an alternative action.
 
Faithfully,
 
Douglas Castle


Braintenance - Stay razor sharp.
The Internationalist Page - A world without barriers.
The Global Futurist - Revealing trends.
Taking Command! - Mastering your fate.

Join us! With your free membership, you'll receive THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter and The BLUE TUESDAY Report. Click on: http://twitlik.com/IN. You'll also want to get your free RSS feed or Daily email delivered to your inbox -- just click on http://twitlik.com/Daily and make your selection.
COMMENT On This Article!

Friday, January 08, 2010

Buzz-To-Brand

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Buzz-To-Brand

Fact: It takes a Buzz to build a Brand - Douglas Castle

Take a look at TNNW BUZZWORKS for a bit more about what is entailed in igniting the Buzz that leads to the creation of the Brand. Hmmm... The Buzz that leads to the creation of the Brand™I think I like it…




The NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter and the BLUE TUESDAY REPORT free.

Thursday, January 07, 2010

Questioning Motives, Benefits, Costs and Ultimate Effect

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Questioning Motives, Benefits, Costs and Ultimate Effect

Note: This article was written by Author Douglas Castle for publication in BRAINTENANCE, THE GLOBAL FUTURIST , TAKING COMMAND! and THE NATIONAL NETWORKER RSS and Daily email feeds (which are available to the public at no charge). This article may be reprinted, re-published or transmitted without the consent of the author provided that the article is published intact, unedited and in its entirety, and that all links contained herein are left live for the reader's reference. You may become a Member of The National Networker Global Interworked Cooperative Business Community and receive our publications (free) by clicking on http://twitlik.com/IN.


Dear Friends:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is about to set down some new, strict, health standards for companies which generate any type of waste products. My preliminary analysis (in brief) of this policy is set forth below a reprint of the article which happened to inspire me to say "I told you so." But I'm not going to do that, as appropriate as that may be. Analyzing this bit of news about a governmental agency policy is a wonderful intellectual/ brain-building and policymaking/ strategic planning exercise. For those of you who are new to this, here's how we play the game:

Firstly, read the article excerpted from THE NEW YORK TIMES which follows; secondly, click the back button and take a look at my findings and see how yours compare. Remember: No peeking at my answers until you have had an opportunity to form your own opinions!
And now (cue drumroll), the article --

Breaking News Alert
The New York Times
Thu, January 07, 2010 -- 11:44 AM ET
-----

E.P.A. Announces Strict New Health Standards for Smog

The Environmental Protection Agency's new limits -- which are
presented as a range -- will likely put hundreds more
counties nationwide in violation, a designation that will
require them to find additional ways to clamp down on
pollution or face government sanctions, most likely the loss
of federal highway dollars.

Read More:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/01/07/us/AP-US-EPA-Smog.html?emc=na

####

Okay. Now that you've had an opportunity to preview the policy, compare your findings with mine:

1. MOTIVES - A power-grab by the EPA to further regulate industry under the guise of environmental protection and being green-compliant. A money-grab by the federal government to fund its burgeoning deficit by making counties pay a ransom to the federal government -- it's a sort of reverse federal-aid program to save the federal government money, and to actually collect more tax, penalty and compliance dollars from the counties in every city and state. The federal government is grabbing the near empty wallet of a fellow (metaphorically) already walking to bankrupcy court. [The fellow is walking because he has lost his job and cannot afford cabfare, and because his own automobile is excreting too much CO2, the deadly greenhouse gas that is integral for photosynthesis....but that's another tale].

2. BENEFITS - The federal government, the EPA and scores of attorneys will benefit. The environment (and the people who choose to continue living in it) will benefit by a reduction in potentially toxic factory emissions and cleaner air. Ahhhhh! 

3. COSTS - All borne by the taxpaying public and businesses (the costs of regulatory compliance are generally quite high). There will be increased incentives for businesses, jobs and talent to go overseas. There will be reduced industrial output in the US, decreasing employment, and other additional hardships to numerous to list. Service businesses, which shouldn't be as immediately and precipitously impacted, will feel the pinch as county tax bases are reduced and greater tax burdens are placed upon them.

4. ULTIMATE EFFECT - Negative for all US residents employed (or unemployed) in the private sector. Economically contractionary.

Now: How does your analysis stack up beside mine? You can comment on this article by clicking on:
Please remember to put the words "EPA POLICY" in the subject line of your message.

Faithfully,

Douglas Castle


Tuesday, January 05, 2010

SUICIDE: Being Proactive Can Save a Life.

Share this ARTICLE with your colleagues on LinkedIn .



Public Service Announcement:

The American Foundation For Suicide Prevention Programs. Help save a life. Learn more - http://twitlik.com/AFSP   Every life is precious. Know how to help. Know how to access emergency treatment. Always take any discussions or thoughts of suicide seriously. Don't ever leave a suicidal person alone. An hour of conversation while waiting for emergency help to arrive can make all the difference.

If you are having thoughts of suicide, call for emergency treatment (there are some excellent resources at LINKS 4 LIFE), and then call a friend or family member. Keep calling until you connect. If you can't get anyone, get to a place where there are people and some activity. There's hope... and there's help. I promise.

Douglas Castle,
THE NATIONAL NETWORKER COMPANIES


Braintenance - Stay razor sharp.
The Internationalist Page - A world without barriers.
The Global Futurist - Revealing trends.
Taking Command! - Mastering your fate.

Join us! With your free membership, you'll receive THE NATIONAL NETWORKER Newsletter and The BLUE TUESDAY Report. Click on: http://twitlik.com/IN. You'll also want to get your free RSS feed or Daily email delivered to your inbox -- just click on http://twitlik.com/Daily and make your selection.
COMMENT On This Article!

BLOG ARCHIVE

Bookmark and Share